Agency: An Overlooked Human Need

Ever feel like you're drifting through life as if you’re a small boat on a vast ocean, pushed around by currents and winds you can’t control? One week, a wave of work deadlines knocks you off balance; the next, family obligations pull you in a direction you never planned to go. It's not necessarily the course you wanted, but it sometimes feels like external forces decide it for you. In these moments, something vital is missing: a sense of control over where you're headed.

That sense of control is agency – the ability to make choices about your own life and act on them. Agency is a basic human need, yet it’s often overlooked in the places it matters most: our support systems, workplaces, and even our families. We see it (or the lack of it) in the struggle for a healthy work/life balance, and we sense it in communities where structural inequities leave people feeling powerless. When we talk about empowerment or independence, we’re really talking about agency. And in a world that sometimes forgets how crucial that is, it's worth taking a deeper look at what agency means and why it matters so much.

What We're Really Talking About

So what exactly do we mean by agency? In simple terms, agency is the capacity to act intentionally and make your own choices. It's your inner sense that “I can do this” or “I have a say in what happens to me.” When you have agency, you feel at least partly in control of your life – you’re not just a passenger on the ride, you have a hand on the steering wheel. It’s the difference between living by design and living by default.

Psychologically, agency is closely tied to our sense of self-efficacy and autonomy. Albert Bandura, a prominent psychologist, put it simply: people “are producers of their life circumstances and not just the products of them.” In other words, we aren't simply along for the ride; we can influence the outcome. A strong sense of agency helps people bounce back from setbacks because they trust they can change their situation. It’s like a personal engine for motivation: if you believe you can shape your future, you’re more likely to take initiative and persist through challenges.

Sociologically, the term “agency” often comes up in contrast to “structure.” Structures are the big forces in life – things like social class, laws, cultural norms, or economic conditions – that can constrain what we do. Agency is that individual capacity to act independently within or against those constraints. It’s about the choices we manage to carve out for ourselves even when the menu life hands us is limited. In everyday terms, agency is when someone finds a way to further their education despite growing up in a disadvantaged neighborhood, or when employees push back against a rigid company policy to create a better work culture. It’s the human side of the story – our ability to assert, “I am not just what happens to me. I can respond and initiate.”

From a philosophical perspective, agency connects to age-old debates about free will and moral responsibility. Philosophers have long wondered: Are we free agents charting our destinies, or are we pawns of fate, biology, or divine plan? When we talk about agency in philosophy, we’re embracing the idea that humans are active decision-makers rather than passive observers of their own lives. Thinkers from Aristotle to Kant to Sartre have emphasized in different ways that being human means having the capacity to choose and to act according to one’s own reasoning or values. For instance, existentialist philosophers argued that we are “condemned to be free,” highlighting that even under oppressive circumstances, people must still make choices (if only internal ones, like how to view a situation). With that freedom comes responsibility and sometimes anxiety, because choices have consequences. In short, whether we look at it through a psychological, sociological, or philosophical lens, agency boils down to personal freedom and the power to shape our own lives in meaningful ways.

Where The Concept of Agency Came From

The idea of personal agency may feel modern, but its roots run deep. We can trace the concept back through philosophy and early social thought. Enlightenment philosophers like Immanuel Kant in the 18th century put a spotlight on human autonomy – basically, our ability to govern ourselves through reason. Kant believed that moral action was only possible because people have free will and can choose to follow moral principles. In other words, he treated humans as agents capable of making rational choices, not just creatures pushed around by impulses or authority.

Jumping to the 20th century, the existentialists – thinkers like Jean-Paul Sartre and Simone de Beauvoir – placed agency front and center in their understanding of life. Sartre famously said, “Man is condemned to be free,” highlighting that we always have to choose our actions and define our lives, even when circumstances are harsh or constrained. For these philosophers, agency was a double-edged sword: it’s empowering to direct your own life, but it’s also a heavy responsibility because you can’t easily blame your situation solely on external forces.

In more recent history, the concept of agency found its way into psychology. Early psychologists didn’t talk much about “agency” explicitly – in fact, behaviorists in the early 20th century saw human behavior as something mostly shaped by the environment (think of Pavlov’s dogs or Skinner’s pigeons). But as psychology evolved, researchers started to recognize that people aren't passive; we set goals, make choices, and reflect on the outcomes of our actions. In the late 1970s, Albert Bandura introduced the idea of self-efficacy, which has become central to how we understand agency today. Self-efficacy is the belief in your own ability to accomplish tasks and influence outcomes. Bandura showed that people with higher self-efficacy (in other words, a strong sense of personal agency) are more resilient and more likely to take on difficult challenges. They act as though they can shape their circumstances instead of just reacting to them. This was a big shift in psychology – moving from seeing humans as conditioned by their environment to seeing humans as active shapers of their reality. Since then, studies of motivation and personality have reinforced that the feeling of “I can do this” is more than just a nice thought; it's a cornerstone of how we engage with the world.

How Agency Has Changed

Our expectations around choice, control, and self-direction have evolved a lot over the generations. Take the example of career and work life: our grandparents or great-grandparents often had fairly defined paths and fewer options – maybe they took over the family business or stuck with one employer for decades because stability was the priority. They might not have expected to have a lot of personal say in the matter; work was something you did to put food on the table, period.

Fast forward to today, and the mindset is quite different. Many people (especially younger generations) prize autonomy and purpose in their work. Instead of staying in a job out of a sense of duty or survival, we hear things like, “If I’m not happy at this job, I’ll quit and find something better,” or “I need a career that aligns with my values.” The bar has been raised on what counts as a fulfilling life, and having a sense of agency is a huge part of that. We expect to have choices – not just in our jobs, but in everything from the food we eat to the way we parent our children. In a way, modern life offers a menu with far more items than before, and we’ve come to believe that we should get to choose rather than simply take what’s given.

Economic and technological shifts have also changed how we experience agency. On one hand, technology and globalization have opened up new avenues for personal freedom. Think about it: today you can learn almost any skill online, start a business from your living room with just a laptop, or connect with communities of people across the world who share your interests or grievances. Social media gives individuals a platform to voice opinions and rally others to a cause in a way that was unimaginable a few decades ago. A talented artist in a small town can now reach a global market through the internet, bypassing traditional gatekeepers. These are empowering developments – they can give people a greater sense of control over their destiny. Bandura himself noted that modern technological changes “present vastly greater opportunities for people to exercise control over how they live their lives.” A freelance web developer or a remote worker today might enjoy a level of flexibility and self-direction that earlier generations could only dream of.

On the other hand, more choice and freedom can be a double-edged sword. We’ve all heard of the “paradox of choice” – having dozens of options for everything from career paths to cereal brands can sometimes lead to decision paralysis or dissatisfaction. And while technology offers freedom, it also brings new challenges: the expectation to be available and productive around the clock, the way algorithms and curated feeds subtly shape what information we see (and thus what choices we’re aware of), and the erosion of boundaries between work and personal life. Generationally, there’s a shift in coping with these pressures. Older generations might shake their heads at a 25-year-old who turns down a stable job because it doesn’t feel fulfilling – something almost unthinkable in the 1950s – whereas younger generations view that as exercising rightful agency to seek meaningful work. The conversation about agency today is nuanced: we celebrate personal freedom more openly than in the past, yet we also worry about whether all this freedom is making us happier or just more anxious. We’re challenged to find balance – to empower people with choice and autonomy, but also to support them in managing the complexities that come with those choices. Ultimately, the idea of agency has expanded in our culture, and with it comes the responsibility to ensure that the ability to direct one’s life is not just a luxury for the few, but a reality we strive to extend to everyone.

Systemic Issues Affecting Agency

It’s important to recognize that agency doesn’t exist in a vacuum. While it’s a personal capacity, it can be heavily influenced – even stifled – by external conditions. Here are some of the systemic issues that can limit people’s sense of control over their lives:

• Poverty and Economic Hardship: Financial insecurity is one of the biggest thieves of agency. When you’re living paycheck to paycheck or below the poverty line, your choices narrow dramatically. You might feel forced to take any job, no matter how grueling or low-paid, because the alternative could be losing your home or going hungry. Long-term planning (like pursuing higher education or switching careers) can feel out of reach when you’re just trying to get through the week. Poverty often comes with a domino effect of constraints – limited access to transportation can restrict where you can work, lack of affordable childcare can dictate when or whether you work, and so on. Moreover, those in poverty frequently encounter systemic biases and red tape when seeking assistance, which can further erode their sense of control. It’s a cruel irony: the people who need agency the most – to improve their situation – often find themselves in circumstances that grant them the least of it.

• Rigid Workplace Structures: Ever had a job where every minute of your day was micromanaged, or every decision had to go through five layers of bureaucracy? Such rigid workplace environments can sap employees’ agency. When workplaces treat people like replaceable cogs – monitoring their every move or giving them zero input in how to do their work – it sends a message that their judgment isn’t valued. This not only breeds frustration, it can lead to a kind of learned helplessness: people stop putting forth ideas or taking initiative because they know it won’t make a difference. In contrast, workplaces that encourage employee autonomy and trust their people to make decisions tend to see higher morale and creativity. Unfortunately, not everyone works in that kind of enlightened organization. Many industries still cling to old top-down management styles that leave little room for individual discretion, and employees in those settings often feel their agency slipping away between punch clocks, strict policies, and “because I said so” management.

• Bureaucracy in Healthcare and Social Services: Navigating a complex system can make anyone feel powerless. Imagine being a patient with a chronic illness trying to get approval from your insurance for a treatment your doctor says you need, and spending hours on hold or arguing with claims departments. Or think about applying for unemployment or disability benefits and having to jump through hoop after hoop – endless forms, proof of this and that, waiting periods – all while you’re already in a vulnerable spot. These systems, while necessary to organize aid and resources, often end up unintentionally stripping away agency from the very people they intend to help. When you have to fight just to be heard or to cut through the red tape, it’s easy to feel like you have no control over the outcome. Patients and clients can become passive or fatalistic, simply because the system is too convoluted to navigate with any sense of personal control. The result is that people might not advocate for themselves fully, or they might give up on seeking help altogether, which can worsen their situation.

• Gender Roles and Cultural Expectations: Society’s expectations can significantly shape – or limit – the choices we feel we have. Traditional gender roles are a clear example. For a long time (and still today in many contexts), women and men have been funneled into certain life scripts: the man as the provider, the woman as the caregiver, for instance. These norms can limit agency by making some options feel off-limits or frowned upon. A woman might feel discouraged from being too ambitious in her career because it conflicts with the expectation that she should prioritize family, whereas a man might feel he can’t step back from work to take care of his mental health or spend more time raising his kids because society prizes his identity as a breadwinner. Beyond gender, cultural expectations around things like religion, caste, family honor, or community traditions can either support or stifle agency. For instance, someone might feel obligated to enter a family business or an arranged marriage, despite their personal dreams lying elsewhere. When your personal desires consistently clash with what your community expects of you, it can create a deep conflict and a diminished sense that you have control over your own life's direction.

These systemic issues show that personal agency isn’t just about individual willpower or a positive mindset; context matters enormously. When we address problems like poverty, workplace reform, healthcare accessibility, or gender inequality, we’re also doing the work of restoring or expanding people’s agency. It’s about identifying where the structures are inadvertently (or deliberately) boxing people in, and figuring out how to give people more room to move, decide, and thrive. Often it comes down to a simple principle: the people affected by a decision or a policy should have a voice in it. Whether it’s designing a welfare program with input from its recipients, or a company creating policies based on employee feedback, honoring agency at a systemic level means involving people in shaping the systems that shape them.

The Ripple Effect of Agency Across Families and Community

Agency isn’t just a “nice-to-have” for isolated individuals; it has a ripple effect that touches families and whole communities. Think about a time when you witnessed someone close to you feel empowered to take control of their situation – the positive energy doesn’t stay contained to that one person. For example, imagine a young woman who goes back to school to get a degree after years of feeling stuck in low-wage jobs. Not only does she transform her own prospects, but her children see her determination and begin to believe that they too can chart their own course. Her siblings or friends might be inspired to pursue education or training as well, now that she’s shown it’s possible. One person’s act of agency – whether it’s starting a new career, standing up to unfair treatment, or making a healthy lifestyle change – often encourages others around them to reflect on their own choices. It's as if agency is contagious: seeing someone assert control over their life can spark others to do the same.

The effects extend to our communities and society at large. Empowered individuals tend to be more active citizens. They’re the ones who might start a neighborhood cleanup initiative, organize a community garden, or campaign for changes in local policy. When people believe their actions matter, they invest time and effort into collective issues. A community where many people have a strong sense of agency is usually more vibrant and resilient. Problems are more likely to be addressed because residents trust that their involvement can make a difference. On the flip side, when a community is full of individuals who have been systematically stripped of agency (say, by long-term unemployment, discrimination, or a history of their voices being ignored), apathy can set in. People may stop voting, stop engaging in community improvement efforts, and withdraw from public life because they feel it’s pointless. That kind of disengagement can weaken community bonds and make it even harder to solve shared problems. In contrast, when people see examples of neighbors successfully advocating for change – like getting a dangerous intersection fixed or rallying to support a local school – it reinforces everyone’s belief that collective effort pays off.

Within families, agency plays a subtle but important role in relationships. Parents with a healthy sense of their own agency often model independence and decision-making for their kids. They might encourage children to voice their opinions, make age-appropriate choices, and learn from mistakes rather than shielding them from every failure. For instance, a parent might let a child decide how to spend their allowance, even if the child might waste it, just so they learn the consequences and feel the pride of making their own decision. These small moments accumulate into a powerful lesson: that the child’s choices matter and that they have control (and responsibility) in their life. Such kids often grow up more confident and better equipped to navigate the world. Conversely, in families where control is one-sided – say a household where one authoritarian figure dictates everything – children may either rebel destructively or carry that pattern forward, expecting that someone else will always call the shots. That can affect their adult relationships, their careers, and how they engage in society. In essence, fostering agency at home creates a foundation for empowered individuals who are more likely to contribute positively to their communities.

Final Thoughts

Agency is sometimes described as “power to” rather than “power over” – it’s not about dominating others, but about having the ability to direct your own life. As we've explored, this quiet human need threads through personal well-being, professional fulfillment, and the health of our communities. Recognizing and supporting agency should be a central goal in how we design our institutions and social structures. This means creating workplaces that give employees some control and trust, schools that encourage student voice and choice, social programs that involve people in decisions about their own care, and family norms that respect each member’s individuality.

When people feel they have agency, they tend to be more motivated, creative, and resilient. They’re not just waiting for life to happen to them; they’re actively engaging with whatever comes their way. In a society, that translates to innovation, civic participation, and social progress. On the flip side, when large numbers of people lack agency – whether due to oppression, poverty, or inflexible systems – the consequences include frustration, mental health struggles, and stagnation. It’s hard to give your best to your family, your job, or your community when you feel disempowered at every turn.

Understanding agency isn’t just an academic exercise; it’s a key to unlocking human potential. It reminds us that beyond meeting basic needs like food and safety, we need to nurture people’s capacity to choose and to act. That might mean reforming a policy to include community input, or as simple as a manager asking their team for feedback and truly listening. Every time we create a space where people have a say, we are validating their agency and, in turn, making our collective environment richer and more inclusive.

Ultimately, fostering agency comes down to respect – respecting each person’s ability to be the author of their own story. Life will always have circumstances we can’t control, like storms that blow in without warning. But if individuals have the tools and opportunities to adjust their sails, they stand a much better chance of reaching the destinations they dream of. And when more people in a society feel like captains of their own ship (rather than mere passengers or, worse, prisoners), we all benefit from the shared energy, talent, and hope that arises. Supporting agency isn’t just about individual well-being; it’s about building a future where everyone has a fair chance to navigate their own course – and to help steer our communities toward greater equity and fulfillment for all.

References

Bandura, A. (1977). Self-efficacy: Toward a unifying theory of behavioral change. Psychological Review, 84(2), 191–215. https://doi.org/10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191 

Bandura, A. (2001). Social cognitive theory: An agentic perspective. Annual Review of Psychology, 52, 1–26. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.52.1.1 

de Beauvoir, S. (1949). The second sex (H. M. Parshley, Trans.). Vintage.

Giddens, A. (1984). The constitution of society: Outline of the theory of structuration. University of California Press.

Kant, I. (1785). Groundwork of the metaphysics of morals (M. Gregor, Trans., 1997 ed.). Cambridge University Press.

Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Self-determination theory and the facilitation of intrinsic motivation, social development, and well-being. American Psychologist, 55(1), 68–78. https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.68 

Sartre, J.-P. (1943). Being and nothingness (H. E. Barnes, Trans.). Routledge.

Sen, A. (1999). Development as freedom. Oxford University Press.

Zimmerman, M. A. (1995). Psychological empowerment: Issues and illustrations. American Journal of Community Psychology, 23(5), 581–599. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02506983